Atomic Heist

Atomic Heist Logo

Description

Atomic Heist is a sci-fi roguelike twin-stick shooter where players control a combat ship attempting to steal a leaking nuclear core from an overrun space station. With the Rhaokyn alien forces locking down the station, players must fight their way through randomly generated levels using strategic combat while carefully managing limited ammo. The game features fast-paced action, power-up collection, permanent upgrades, and multiple modes including an endless arena challenge, all set against a backdrop of interstellar conflict between humanity, the Delotians, and the predatory Rhaokyns.

Gameplay Videos

Where to Buy Atomic Heist

PC

Guides & Walkthroughs

Reviews & Reception

metacritic.com (80/100): A good game should give you a reason to return to it frequently, and Atomic Heist has that quality without question.

opencritic.com (20/100): Atomic Heist is a side-scrolling action shooter in the same line as the NES game Gradius, but with a harsh difficulty level and a beta-looking design.

purenintendo.com (70/100): Atomic Heist is a simple roguelike with a cool sci-fi story and all the colourful explosions you could wish for.

keengamer.com : Atomic Heist does a lot of small things right, but one or two major issues winded up having a significant effect on my ability to enjoy the game as a whole.

gamingnexus.com (20/100): I have not played a game this hopelessly unfair in my 30+ years of gaming.

Atomic Heist: A Cautionary Tale of Ambition and Execution in the Roguelike Shooter Genre

In the vast, unforgiving expanse of the indie game universe, countless titles are launched with dreams of becoming the next cult classic, only to vanish into the void of obscurity. Atomic Heist, a sci-fi roguelike twin-stick shooter developed by Live Aliens and published by Drageus Games S.A., is a stark embodiment of this struggle. Released in 2018 for Windows and Xbox One, with a Nintendo Switch port following in 2019, it is a game built on a foundation of intriguing ideas, yet ultimately crippled by fundamental design flaws that prevent it from achieving its potential. It stands not as a monument to greatness, but as a detailed case study in how a promising concept can be derailed by its own execution.

Development History & Context

Studio Vision and the Indie Landscape of 2018
Live Aliens, a relatively obscure developer, entered a crowded market in the late 2010s. This was the golden age of the indie roguelike, a period defined by the monumental success of titles like The Binding of Isaac and Nuclear Throne. These games perfected a formula of punishing difficulty, deep systemic mechanics, and near-infinite replayability. For a small studio like Live Aliens, the goal was likely to capture a slice of this lucrative market by offering a familiar yet distinct experience.

Their vision, as gleaned from the game’s promotional materials and Steam description, was to create a “fast-paced twin-stick combat” experience set within a narratively rich sci-fi universe. The inclusion of a radiation mechanic that acted as a persistent time limit was a clear attempt to innovate within the genre, adding a layer of constant tension. Developed on the Unity engine, the game benefited from the accessibility of the tools but also fell prey to the engine’s reputation for a certain level of asset-store homogeneity if not carefully curated. The technological constraints were less about hardware limitations and more about the scope of a small team aiming to deliver a full-featured game—a challenge that would ultimately reveal cracks in its foundation.

Narrative & Thematic Deep Dive

A Backstory Richer Than The Game Itself
Atomic Heist possesses a narrative framework that is, ironically, more compelling and better written than the game it supports. The story, delivered through introductory text and collectible “records” scattered throughout the levels, paints a picture of a universe recovering from a tragic misunderstanding.

Humanity’s first contact was not with a hostile invader, but with a refugee species, the Delotians, who were fleeing genocide at the hands of the imperialistic Rhaokyns. Mistaking their arrival for an invasion, humanity waged a six-year war against the Delotians, only later discovering the truth. The game’s mission—the “Atomic Heist” itself—is a desperate attempt at redemption. The Rhaokyns have captured the Hyperion-Six space station and its atomic impulse core. The player’s objective is to infiltrate, steal the core, and escape before the station is locked down, preventing the Rhaokyns from harnessing its power.

This backstory is a sophisticated setup exploring themes of xenophobia, the consequences of militaristic paranoia, and the struggle for atonement. It’s a narrative that deserved a more prominent role, perhaps through scripted events or character interactions. Instead, it is relegated to optional lore collectibles, a treasure for those willing to brave the oppressive gameplay to find it, but utterly lost on the majority of players who will be focused solely on survival.

Gameplay Mechanics & Systems

A House of Cards Built on Unstable Controls
At its core, Atomic Heist is a top-down, twin-stick shooter with roguelike elements. The core loop is simple: navigate randomly generated levels, defeat all enemies, collect power-ups, and find the exit hatch before radiation from your stolen core depletes your health.

The Good: A Robust Arsenal
The game does several things well. Its weapon variety is commendable. Beyond the standard machine gun, players can find missile launchers, grenade launchers, plasma blasters that stun enemies, and specialty weapons with tracking or splinter shots. Crucially, most of these weapons are viable and useful, avoiding the common pitfall of having one “best” gun that renders the others obsolete. The upgrade system is also thoughtful; rate-of-fire upgrades can be manually adjusted, allowing players to conserve ammo—a vital strategic consideration.

Permanent meta-progression exists in the form of ship upgrades (e.g., higher starting health, better radiation shielding) and cosmetic unlocks (avatars, reticles) earned by gaining experience through combat. This provides a compelling reason to persist through failure, a hallmark of a good roguelike.

The Catastrophic Flaw: Movement and Punishment
However, these positive elements are completely overshadowed by one catastrophic flaw: the movement system. Multiple reviewers across different platforms consistently reported the same issue: the player’s ship moves far too fast and is incredibly imprecise to control. This transforms the game from a strategic shooter into a chaotic pinball simulator.

This poor control has a domino effect that breaks the entire game:
1. Inescapable Damage: Dodging enemy projectiles or navigating tight, claustrophobic corridors becomes an exercise in frustration. Players routinely careen into hazards or bounce off walls directly into enemy fire.
2. Conflict with Core Mechanics: This directly contradicts the game’s two other primary systems:
* The Radiation Timer: The core is constantly leaking, imposing a hard time limit that encourages speed. But speeding up is a death sentence due to the uncontrollable movement.
* The Demanding Combat: Enemies are aggressive, numerous, and hit hard. The game demands precision to overcome them, but the controls make precision impossible.
3. A “HUD” Power-Up: In a bewildering design decision, the game treats the basic HUD (displaying health, ammo, and radiation levels) as an optional upgrade that occupies a valuable equipment slot. Without it, players receive only vague audio warnings, often too late to react. This is a fundamental quality-of-life feature inexplicably gatekept behind the game’s progression.

The result is an experience that feels profoundly unfair. As Kevin O’Connell from Gaming Nexus starkly put it, “I have not played a game this hopelessly unfair in my 30+ years of gaming.” Players are caught in an impossible dilemma: go slow and die to radiation, or go fast and die to a loss of control. This reduces success to luck rather than skill.

World-Building, Art & Sound

A Serviceable but Unremarkable Presentation
Atomic Heist’s visual and audio presentation is functional but fails to distinguish itself. The 2D sci-fi art style is clean, with enemy designs and weapon effects that are distinct and readable—a crucial element in a chaotic shooter. The environments, however, are criticized as “bland,” “uninteresting,” and repetitive. While levels are randomly generated, the tilesets and color palettes offer little variety, leading to a monotonous visual experience across runs.

A notable oddity is the clash between the in-game art and the realistic-style character avatars players can unlock. This dissonance suggests a lack of cohesive artistic direction.

The sound design is equally perfunctory. The sci-fi themed soundtrack is forgettable and repetitive. Sound effects for weapons and explosions are serviceable but lack punch. The game features minimal voice acting, limited to a narrator in the introduction, which only serves to highlight its absence elsewhere.

Reception & Legacy

A Legacy of Frustration
Atomic Heist was met with a deeply mixed to negative critical reception. Its aggregated scores tell a story of disappointment:
* On MobyGames, it holds a critical average of 25% based on one review.
* On Metacritic, the Xbox One version holds a score of 55 based on four reviews, ranging from a 20 (Gaming Nexus) to an 80 (XBLA Fans).
* OpenCritic shows a score of -1%, placing it in the lowest percentile of rated games.

The reviews are unanimous in identifying its core problems. eShopper Reviews (25%) summarized it as having “unimpressive visuals and punishing gameplay,” concluding the Nintendo Switch has far better options in the genre. While some critics, like Pure Nintendo (7/10), found fleeting fun in its explosive chaos, they were the exception.

Commercially, it faded into obscurity. With only a handful of user reviews on Steam and minimal discussion in community forums, it failed to capture an audience. Its legacy is not one of influence but of caution. It serves as a textbook example for aspiring developers of how critical it is to get the core feel of a game—especially its controls—right before anything else. No amount of weapon variety or interesting backstory can save a game that is fundamentally unpleasant to play.

Conclusion

A Verdict for the History Books
Atomic Heist is a fascinating failure. It is a game with genuine merits: a surprisingly deep and tragic backstory, a diverse and balanced arsenal of weapons, and systems of progression that, in a more polished game, would be highly engaging. The vision of a tense, time-pressured sci-fi heist is a compelling one.

Yet, these ambitions are utterly demolished by the catastrophic failure of its core gameplay loop. The uncontrollable movement, combined with the punishing radiation timer and harsh enemy design, creates an experience that is more frustrating than challenging, more arbitrary than skillful. It is a game at war with itself, its mechanics constantly working in opposition.

In the annals of video game history, Atomic Heist will not be remembered as a hidden gem or a cult classic. It will stand as a cautionary tale—a detailed lesson that the most innovative ideas and narrative depth are meaningless if a game fails to execute on the most fundamental level: being fun, fair, and responsive to play. For historians and journalists, it is a perfect case study. For players, it is a relic best left in the radiation-soaked depths of the Hyperion-Six station.

Scroll to Top