Microsoft Revenge of Arcade

Microsoft Revenge of Arcade is a 1998 Windows compilation featuring authentic emulations of five classic Namco arcade games: Mappy, Motos, Ms. Pac-Man, Rally X, and Xevious. The game uses original arcade hardware code, complete with self-diagnostic routines, to deliver a faithful retro experience. Players can enjoy these timeless titles with their original graphics and sound, offering a nostalgic trip back to the golden age of arcade gaming.

Microsoft Revenge of Arcade: A Nostalgic Journey Through Namco’s Golden Age

Introduction

In the late 1990s, as the gaming industry hurtled toward the 3D revolution, Microsoft released Microsoft Revenge of Arcade, a compilation that served as both a love letter to the golden age of arcade gaming and a curious artifact of its time. This third entry in Microsoft’s Arcade series (following Microsoft Arcade in 1993 and Microsoft Return of Arcade in 1996) offered players a chance to relive the glory days of Namco’s arcade dominance. But was it a triumphant revival or a misguided cash grab? This review delves deep into the game’s development, its place in gaming history, and its lasting legacy.

---

Development History & Context

The Studio and Vision

Microsoft Revenge of Arcade was developed in collaboration between Microsoft and Namco, two titans of their respective industries. Microsoft, riding high on the success of Windows 95 and its growing influence in the gaming market, sought to capitalize on the nostalgia for arcade classics. Namco, meanwhile, was eager to reintroduce its iconic titles to a new generation of PC gamers.

The project was spearheaded by Microsoft producer Laura Fryer and a team of 34 developers, including Namco producers Masashi Suzuki and Yoshiaki Kawamura. The vision was clear: create a faithful emulation of five Namco arcade classics—Mappy, Motos, Ms. Pac-Man, Rally X, and Xevious—while leveraging the power of modern PCs to enhance accessibility and preservation.

Technological Constraints and Innovations

The late 1990s were a transitional period for PC gaming. While 3D accelerators like 3dfx’s Voodoo cards were gaining traction, Revenge of Arcade remained firmly rooted in 2D, reflecting the hardware limitations of the era. The game required Windows 95 or later, though its demo was compatible with Windows 3.1, showcasing Microsoft’s commitment to backward compatibility.

One of the most significant technical achievements of Revenge of Arcade was its use of true hardware emulation. Unlike previous entries in the Arcade series, which were rewritten versions of the original games, Revenge of Arcade ran the original arcade ROMs through a custom emulator. This meant that each game began with the self-diagnostic routine from the original arcade hardware, adding an authentic touch for purists.

However, this approach came with drawbacks. The emulation was not perfect, and the games ran in a small window or a full-screen mode with black bars, failing to utilize the full resolution of modern monitors. This design choice, while faithful to the arcade experience, felt outdated even in 1998.

The Gaming Landscape of 1998

By 1998, the gaming industry was in the midst of a seismic shift. 3D graphics were becoming the norm, with titles like Half-Life, Unreal, and The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time pushing the boundaries of what was possible. Arcade gaming, once the pinnacle of the industry, was in decline, with home consoles and PCs offering superior graphics and gameplay experiences.

In this context, Revenge of Arcade was something of an anomaly. It was a throwback to a simpler time, appealing to older gamers who had grown up in arcades but struggling to resonate with younger audiences weaned on Quake and Final Fantasy VII. The compilation’s release was met with mixed reactions, reflecting the tension between nostalgia and progress.

---

Narrative & Thematic Deep Dive

The Games: A Trip Down Memory Lane

Revenge of Arcade featured five Namco classics, each with its own unique charm and gameplay mechanics:

1. Ms. Pac-Man (1982)

   • The undisputed star of the compilation, Ms. Pac-Man was a refined and expanded version of the original Pac-Man, featuring new mazes, improved AI, and a more dynamic gameplay experience. The game’s simple yet addictive mechanics—navigating mazes, eating dots, and avoiding ghosts—remained as compelling as ever.

2. Xevious (1983)

   • A vertical-scrolling shoot ’em up, Xevious was notable for its innovative gameplay, which combined traditional shooting mechanics with ground-based bombing runs. Its sci-fi aesthetic and challenging difficulty made it a standout in the arcade era.

3. Rally X (1980)

   • A top-down racing game, Rally X tasked players with navigating a maze-like track while collecting flags and avoiding enemy cars. Its simple premise belied a surprisingly deep and strategic gameplay experience.

4. Mappy (1983)

   • A platformer starring a police mouse, Mappy was known for its colorful graphics and fast-paced gameplay. Players had to navigate a series of floors, bouncing on trampolines and avoiding cats to recover stolen goods.

5. Motos (1985)

   • A motorcycle racing game, Motos was the weakest link in the compilation. Its clunky controls and repetitive gameplay made it a forgettable addition, even by 1985 standards.

Themes of Nostalgia and Preservation

At its core, Revenge of Arcade was a celebration of nostalgia. The inclusion of the original arcade ROMs, complete with their diagnostic screens, was a deliberate nod to the authenticity of the arcade experience. For players who had spent their youth pumping quarters into these machines, the compilation was a chance to relive those memories.

However, the game also highlighted the challenges of preserving arcade classics. The emulation, while impressive for its time, was not perfect. Input lag, graphical glitches, and the lack of widescreen support detracted from the experience, reminding players that some things are best left in the past.

The Absence of Modern Enhancements

Unlike later compilations like Namco Museum, Revenge of Arcade made no attempt to modernize the included games. There were no graphical enhancements, no additional gameplay modes, and no bonus content. This purist approach was both a strength and a weakness. While it appealed to hardcore fans, it did little to attract new players who might have been drawn to updated visuals or features.

---

Gameplay Mechanics & Systems

Core Gameplay Loops

Each game in Revenge of Arcade retained its original gameplay mechanics, which were simple yet deeply engaging:

• Ms. Pac-Man: The gameplay loop revolved around navigating mazes, eating dots, and avoiding ghosts. The addition of random maze layouts and improved ghost AI kept the experience fresh.
• Xevious: Players alternated between shooting airborne enemies and bombing ground targets, creating a satisfying rhythm of action and strategy.
• Rally X: The game’s maze-like tracks and flag-collecting mechanics required both speed and precision, with enemy cars adding an element of danger.
• Mappy: The platforming and trampoline mechanics were simple but effective, with the game’s challenge coming from its fast pace and tight controls.
• Motos: The motorcycle racing was straightforward but lacked the depth of the other titles, making it the weakest entry in the compilation.

Combat and Character Progression

Given the arcade origins of these games, combat and progression were straightforward. Players started with a set number of lives and aimed to achieve the highest score possible. There were no RPG elements, no character upgrades, and no complex combat systems—just pure, unadulterated arcade action.

The lack of modern amenities like save states or difficulty adjustments meant that players had to rely on their skills, just as they would have in the arcades. This was a double-edged sword: while it preserved the original challenge, it also made the games feel dated and punishing by 1998 standards.

UI and Controls

The user interface of Revenge of Arcade was functional but unremarkable. The main menu allowed players to select their game of choice, with each title running in its own window. The controls were configurable, supporting both keyboard and joystick inputs, though the latter was recommended for an authentic arcade feel.

One notable flaw was the lack of customization options. Players could not adjust the screen size, resolution, or input lag, which detracted from the overall experience. The inclusion of a “boss key” (a feature that allowed players to quickly exit the game if someone walked in) was a nice touch, harkening back to the days of sneaking arcade games at work.

Innovative or Flawed Systems?

The most innovative aspect of Revenge of Arcade was its use of true hardware emulation. This was a technical achievement for its time, allowing players to experience the games as they were originally intended. However, the emulation was not without its flaws. Input lag, graphical artifacts, and compatibility issues plagued the compilation, making it feel more like a proof of concept than a polished product.

The lack of additional features—such as historical documentation, developer interviews, or even basic tutorials—was another missed opportunity. Later compilations would include these elements, making Revenge of Arcade feel barebones in comparison.

---

World-Building, Art & Sound

Setting and Atmosphere

Each game in Revenge of Arcade had its own distinct setting and atmosphere, reflecting the creativity of Namco’s golden age:

• Ms. Pac-Man: The colorful mazes and cheerful sound effects created a lighthearted, almost whimsical atmosphere.
• Xevious: The sci-fi setting, with its futuristic landscapes and alien enemies, was immersive and engaging.
• Rally X: The top-down racing tracks, though simple, had a certain charm, evoking the feel of a high-speed chase.
• Mappy: The game’s bright, cartoonish visuals and upbeat music made it feel like a Saturday morning cartoon.
• Motos: The motorcycle racing tracks were functional but lacked the personality of the other games.

Visual Direction

The visuals in Revenge of Arcade were faithful to the original arcade games, which meant they were pixelated, low-resolution, and dated by 1998 standards. While this authenticity was appreciated by purists, it did little to attract new players. The games ran in a small window or a full-screen mode with black bars, which felt like a wasted opportunity given the capabilities of modern PCs.

Sound Design

The sound design was another area where Revenge of Arcade excelled in authenticity but struggled in modernity. The original arcade sound effects and music were preserved, which was a treat for fans. However, the tinny, repetitive audio could quickly become grating, especially for players who were not nostalgic for the arcade era.

---

Reception & Legacy

Critical Reception

Microsoft Revenge of Arcade received mixed reviews upon its release in 1998. Critics praised the faithful emulation and the inclusion of classic titles like Ms. Pac-Man and Xevious, but they also noted the compilation’s lack of modern enhancements and its dated presentation.

• Gaming Age (82%): “The graphics and sound marks for this collection may seem low, since, by today’s standards, they’re not even close to passable. However, remember that they are perfect emulators of the originals, so they look authentic in every way.”
• Computer Games Magazine (80%): “Break out your skinny tie and have an ’80s party, dude.”
• Power Play (70%): “Für altgediente Spielejunkies wie mich ist diese Kollektion früher Namco-Titel ein gefundenes Fressen… Einziger Nachteil: Der Preis.”
• Computer Gaming World (50%): “The big exception is MS. PAC MAN, which still brings me as close to a state of Zen as I’ve ever achieved in gaming. Even so, the lure of a single true arcade classic is no reason to recommend lining Bill Gates’ pockets when you can find the same games (or inspired takeoffs) via the Internet for free.”
• Game Over Online (29%): “It’s nothing more, nothing less… well maybe it’s less.”

The general consensus was that Revenge of Arcade was a niche product, appealing primarily to nostalgia-seeking gamers rather than a broader audience.

Commercial Performance

Commercially, Revenge of Arcade was overshadowed by its predecessors. While Microsoft Arcade and Microsoft Return of Arcade had been bestsellers in their respective years, Revenge of Arcade failed to replicate their success. The decline of arcade gaming and the rise of 3D titles meant that there was less demand for retro compilations by 1998.

Evolution of Reputation

Over time, Revenge of Arcade has been largely forgotten, overshadowed by more comprehensive compilations like Namco Museum. While it remains a curiosity for retro gaming enthusiasts, it is not regarded as a must-play title. Its legacy is one of a transitional product—a bridge between the arcade era and the modern gaming landscape, but not a destination in itself.

Influence on Subsequent Games

Revenge of Arcade had little direct influence on subsequent games, but it did contribute to the broader trend of retro compilations. Later releases, such as Namco Museum and Atari Anthology, would refine the formula, offering better emulation, additional features, and more polished presentations. In this sense, Revenge of Arcade was a stepping stone, paving the way for more successful retro collections.

---

Conclusion

Microsoft Revenge of Arcade is a fascinating artifact of its time—a product caught between the nostalgia of the past and the progress of the future. For those who grew up in the arcades of the 1980s, it offered a chance to relive those memories, warts and all. For younger players, it was a curious but ultimately forgettable curiosity.

The compilation’s greatest strength was its authenticity. By using true hardware emulation, Microsoft and Namco preserved the original arcade experience in a way that few other compilations had attempted. However, this authenticity came at a cost. The lack of modern enhancements, the dated presentation, and the technical flaws made Revenge of Arcade feel like a relic rather than a revival.

In the grand tapestry of gaming history, Microsoft Revenge of Arcade occupies a modest but meaningful place. It was not a groundbreaking title, nor was it a commercial juggernaut. Instead, it was a testament to the enduring appeal of arcade classics and a reminder of the challenges of preserving them. For retro gaming enthusiasts, it remains a worthy curiosity—a snapshot of a bygone era, preserved in digital amber.

Final Verdict: 6.5/10 – A Nostalgic Curiosity, But Not a Must-Play