ZuluWar!

ZuluWar! is a turn-based, hex-grid wargame set during the 1879 Anglo-Zulu War in South Africa, allowing players to command either British or Zulu forces across mini-scenarios or a full campaign. The game emphasizes strategic depth with features like supply line management, variable reinforcement schedules, and customizable settings for fog of war, weather, and AI difficulty. Victory is determined by achieving scenario objectives and accumulating more victory points than the opponent, with an optional play-by-email multiplayer mode for competitive play.

ZuluWar!: A Masterclass in Historical Wargaming and Asymmetrical Strategy

Introduction: The Thin Red Line Meets the Impi’s Spear

In the mid-1990s, as real-time strategy games like Command & Conquer and Warcraft II dominated the landscape, ZuluWar! (1996) emerged as a defiant throwback—a meticulously crafted turn-based wargame that dared to focus on one of history’s most lopsided yet fascinating conflicts: the 1879 Anglo-Zulu War. Developed by Incredible Simulations and designed by Jeff Lapkoff and Dennis Bishop, ZuluWar! was not just another hex-and-counter strategy game; it was a bold exploration of asymmetrical warfare, historical fidelity, and the delicate balance between simulation depth and accessibility.

At its core, ZuluWar! is a game about disparity. The British Empire, armed with rifles, artillery, and disciplined formations, faces off against the Zulu Kingdom’s vast but technologically inferior impis (regiments), whose strength lies in sheer numbers, mobility, and guerrilla tactics. The game’s brilliance lies in how it forces players to grapple with these fundamental differences, whether commanding the outnumbered but well-armed British or the swift, overwhelming Zulu forces. With its strategic depth, customizable scenarios, and a rare focus on a conflict often overshadowed by more “glamorous” wars, ZuluWar! carved out a niche that few games have dared to fill since.

This review will dissect ZuluWar! in exhaustive detail, examining its development, narrative and thematic underpinnings, gameplay mechanics, world-building, reception, and lasting legacy. By the end, we’ll determine whether it stands as a forgotten gem of the wargaming genre or a relic of an era when complexity often outweighed mainstream appeal.

---

Development History & Context: Filling a Niche in the Wargaming Wilderness

The Studio and the Vision: Incredible Simulations’ Obsession with Lost Causes

ZuluWar! was the brainchild of Incredible Simulations, a small but ambitious studio founded by Jeff Lapkoff, a designer with a peculiar fascination: historical battles where the odds were stacked against one side. Before ZuluWar!, Lapkoff had already explored this theme in titles like Custer’s Last Command (1991) and Defend the Alamo (1994), games that thrust players into doomed last stands where victory was not guaranteed—if it was even possible.

This design philosophy was radical in the mid-90s, an era where many wargames either glorified overwhelming military dominance (e.g., Panzer General) or abstracted conflict into cold, mathematical exercises. Lapkoff’s games, by contrast, emphasized the human drama of warfare—the desperation of outnumbered defenders, the chaos of mismatched tactics, and the brutal consequences of poor leadership. ZuluWar! was the natural evolution of this approach, pitting the technologically superior but logistically constrained British against the numerically superior but vulnerable Zulu.

Technological Constraints and the Rise of Windows Wargaming

ZuluWar! was Lapkoff’s first foray into Windows-based game development, a significant shift from the DOS-based titles that dominated the wargaming scene. The move to Windows allowed for:
– A more intuitive UI (though still spartan by modern standards).
– Easier multiplayer via Play-by-Email (PBEM), a feature that was becoming increasingly popular among grognards (hardcore wargamers).
– Greater accessibility for players who were transitioning away from DOS.

However, the game was still constrained by the technological limitations of 1996:
– No 3D graphics—the game relied on 2D hex maps and simple sprites.
– No dynamic lighting or advanced animations—unit movements were abstracted.
– Limited AI sophistication—while competent, the AI lacked the adaptive strategies seen in later wargames.

Despite these limitations, ZuluWar! leveraged its procedural generation and modular design to offer a surprising amount of replayability. Players could tweak variables like:
– Reinforcement schedules
– Disease outbreaks (a historical factor that crippled British forces)
– Intelligence and fog of war
– Weather conditions (affecting movement and visibility)
– Zulu firepower (some Zulu warriors had captured firearms)

This level of customization was rare for its time and allowed players to explore alternate histories where, for example, the Zulu might have access to more guns or the British might suffer even worse supply issues.

The Gaming Landscape in 1996: A Wargamer’s Oasis in a Sea of RTS Dominance

1996 was a pivotal year for strategy gaming, but not necessarily for traditional wargames:
– Real-time strategy (RTS) was king, with Command & Conquer (1995) and Warcraft II (1995) defining the genre.
– Turn-based strategy was in decline, with only a few notable exceptions like Civilization II (1996) and X-COM: Terror from the Deep (1995).
– Historical wargames were a niche within a niche, catering almost exclusively to grognards who preferred complexity over accessibility.

ZuluWar! arrived in this environment as a defiant holdout—a game that refused to simplify its mechanics for mass appeal. It was shareware, distributed digitally at a time when physical copies still dominated, and it relied on word-of-mouth within the wargaming community rather than mainstream marketing.

The Anglo-Zulu War: Why This Conflict?

The choice of the Anglo-Zulu War (1879) was deliberate. Unlike the overrepresented World War II or Napoleonic Wars, the Anglo-Zulu War was:
– A David vs. Goliath story—the British, despite their superior firepower, suffered humiliating defeats (e.g., the Battle of Isandlwana, where 1,300 British troops were wiped out by 20,000 Zulu warriors).
– A clash of cultures—British disciplined volley fire vs. Zulu “buffalo horns” encirclement tactics.
– A war of logistics—the British struggled with supply lines, disease, and terrain, while the Zulu relied on speed and surprise.
– Ripe for “what-if” scenarios—what if the Zulu had more guns? What if the British had better intelligence?

Lapkoff and Bishop saw in this conflict a perfect storm of asymmetrical warfare, and ZuluWar! was their attempt to simulate not just the battles, but the broader strategic and logistical challenges that defined the war.

---

Narrative & Thematic Deep Dive: More Than Just Hexes and Combat

The Plot: A Campaign of Hubris and Retribution

ZuluWar! does not follow a traditional linear narrative—there are no cutscenes, no voice acting, and no scripted characters. Instead, the “story” emerges from historical context and player decisions.

The game begins in January 1879, as the British invade Zululand with five columns, aiming to crush King Cetshwayo’s forces and annex the territory. The player can choose to:
– Command the British, attempting to replicate (or improve upon) historical outcomes.
– Lead the Zulu, trying to exploit British overconfidence and logistical weaknesses.

Key historical battles are represented, including:
– Isandlwana (January 22, 1879)—the British suffer a catastrophic defeat.
– Rorke’s Drift (January 22-23, 1879)—a small British garrison holds off thousands of Zulu.
– Ulundi (July 4, 1879)—the final British victory that broke Zulu resistance.

The game’s campaign mode strings these battles together, with victory points determining the overall winner. However, the real narrative depth comes from how the game forces players to confront the realities of 19th-century colonial warfare.

Themes: Colonialism, Asymmetry, and the Fog of War

ZuluWar! is not just a game about moving units on a map—it is a meditation on the brutality and unpredictability of colonial conflict. Several key themes emerge:

1. The Illusion of Technological Superiority

• The British Martini-Henry rifles and artillery should, in theory, make them unstoppable.
• However, poor tactics, overconfidence, and supply issues led to disasters like Isandlwana.
• The game punishes players who assume firepower alone guarantees victory.

2. The Zulu’s Guerrilla Genius

• The Zulu cannot win in a stand-up fight—their strength lies in ambushes, encirclements, and hit-and-run tactics.
• The game’s fog of war mechanic forces British players to scout carefully, lest they walk into a trap.
• Zulu players must exploit terrain and weather to maximize their advantages.

3. Logistics as the True Decider of Wars

• Supply lines are critical—British units degrade without proper resupply.
• Disease (a historical factor) can cripple British forces if not managed.
• The Zulu, while not burdened by supply chains, must manage morale—their warriors were not professional soldiers and could disperse if battles dragged on.

4. The Human Cost of Empire

• Unlike many wargames that treat units as abstract counters, ZuluWar! makes losses feel meaningful.
• The Zulu’s sheer numbers mean that even a “successful” British campaign results in thousands of deaths.
• The game does not glorify war—it presents it as a brutal, uncertain endeavor where luck and preparation matter as much as skill.

Characters and Factions: Historical Figures and Strategic Archetypes

While ZuluWar! lacks individual character development, it represents historical commanders as strategic archetypes:

British Commanders:

• Lord Chelmsford – The overall British commander, whose overconfidence and poor intelligence led to Isandlwana.
• Colonel Anthony Durnford – A more aggressive commander who disobeyed orders and paid the price.
• Lieutenant John Chard & Gonville Bromhead – The heroes of Rorke’s Drift, whose defensive brilliance saved the garrison.

Zulu Commanders:

• King Cetshwayo kaMpande – The Zulu monarch, whose strategic vision was often undermined by his warriors’ impatience.
• Ntshingwayo kaMahole Khoza – The Zulu general who masterminded the victory at Isandlwana.
• Prince Dabulamanzi kaMpande – Led the attack on Rorke’s Drift against Cetshwayo’s orders, showcasing the fractured nature of Zulu command.

The game does not delve into personalities but instead lets the player’s strategy define these figures. A British player who scouts carefully and avoids overextension becomes a cautious Chelmsford; one who charges blindly into Zulu territory repeats his historical mistakes.

Dialogue and Historical Text: The Manual as a Narrative Device

Since ZuluWar! lacks in-game storytelling, much of its narrative weight comes from:
– The manual, which provides detailed historical context on the Anglo-Zulu War.
– Scenario briefings, which explain the strategic situation before each battle.
– Post-battle reports, which compare the player’s performance to historical outcomes.

This approach immerses the player in the era without relying on cinematic flair. It’s a text-heavy, cerebral experience—one that rewards players who engage with the history rather than just the mechanics.

---

Gameplay Mechanics & Systems: A Wargamer’s Toolkit

Core Gameplay Loop: Turn-Based Strategy with a Focus on Maneuver

ZuluWar! is a turn-based, hex-grid wargame played on a strategic map of Zululand. Each turn represents five days, and each hex roughly two miles.

The core loop follows this structure:
1. Reinforcement & Supply Phase – Units arrive, supplies are distributed.
2. Movement Phase – Players maneuver forces, with terrain and weather affecting speed.
3. Combat Phase – Battles resolve based on unit strength, morale, and tactical positioning.
4. Victory Check – Points are awarded for objectives (e.g., capturing key locations, inflicting losses).

Combat: Firepower vs. Numbers

Combat in ZuluWar! is deterministic but influenced by randomness, with outcomes depending on:
– Unit Type – British infantry, cavalry, artillery vs. Zulu impis (regiments).
– Terrain – Open ground favors British firepower; forests and hills favor Zulu ambushes.
– Morale – Units break if they take too many losses or are outflanked.
– Supply – British units fight poorly if unsupplied; Zulu units disperse if morale drops.

Key Asymmetries:

British Strengths	British Weaknesses	Zulu Strengths	Zulu Weaknesses
Superior firepower	Slow movement	High mobility	Poor ranged combat
Artillery support	Supply-dependent	Can encircle	Low morale vs. sustained fire
Disciplined formations	Vulnerable to ambushes	Numerical superiority	No cavalry or artillery

Supply and Logistics: The Unsung Hero of the Game

One of ZuluWar!’s most innovative (and punishing) mechanics is its supply system:
– British units must stay near supply depots or risk attrition.
– Supply lines can be cut by Zulu raiders, forcing British players to defend their logistics.
– Disease (a historical factor) can randomly deplete British forces if they linger too long in hostile territory.

This system forces British players to think like 19th-century commanders—advancing too fast without securing supply routes is a recipe for disaster.

Fog of War and Intelligence: The Unknown Enemy

The game’s fog of war is brutal but fair:
– British players have better scouting but limited visibility in rough terrain.
– Zulu players can hide units in forests and launch surprise attacks.
– Intelligence settings can be adjusted—historically, the British underestimated Zulu numbers, and the game can replicate this.

This mechanic rewards cautious play—charging blindly into unexplored hexes is how Isandlwana happens.

Multiplayer: Play-by-Email (PBEM) as the Ultimate Test

ZuluWar! supported PBEM (Play-by-Email), a feature that was revolutionary for its time. Players could:
– Take turns via email, with the game generating save files to send to opponents.
– Engage in long-term campaigns without needing simultaneous play.
– Experience the tension of not knowing their opponent’s next move.

This mode elevated the game from a solo puzzle to a true strategic duel, where bluffing, misdirection, and psychological warfare played a role.

AI: Competent but Predictable

The AI in ZuluWar! is functional but not brilliant:
– British AI tends to advance methodically, securing supply lines but sometimes missing opportunities for bold strikes.
– Zulu AI is aggressive but can be exploited—it loves flanking maneuvers but struggles with sustained defense.

While not as sophisticated as modern wargame AIs, it provides a decent challenge, especially on higher difficulty settings.

UI and UX: Functional but Unforgiving

The user interface is clean but spartan:
– Top-down hex map with simple unit icons.
– Right-click menus for orders.
– No modern QoL features (e.g., undo buttons, tooltips).

This steep learning curve was par for the course in 1996 wargames, but it alienated casual players who were used to the polish of Civilization II or X-COM.

---

World-Building, Art & Sound: The Atmosphere of War

Setting: Zululand as a Character

The game’s map of Zululand is more than just a battlefield—it’s a living, breathing entity that shapes strategy:
– Rivers and hills act as natural choke points.
– Forests provide cover for Zulu ambushes.
– British forts serve as supply hubs but are vulnerable to siege.

The historical accuracy of the terrain enhances immersion, making players feel like they’re commanding real armies in a real place.

Visuals: Functional but Not Flashy

By 1996 standards, ZuluWar!’s graphics were adequate but not groundbreaking:
– 2D hex maps with basic terrain textures.
– Simple unit sprites (British in red, Zulu in black).
– No animations—combat is resolved via text pop-ups.

However, the clarity of the UI ensures that strategy, not spectacle, takes center stage.

Sound Design: The Silence of the veldt

The game’s audio is minimal:
– No voice acting.
– Basic sound effects (gunfire, drumbeats).
– No musical score.

This absence of audio immersion was a missed opportunity—a haunting Zulu war chant or a British bugle call could have elevated the atmosphere. However, the silence also forces players to focus on the tactical decisions rather than emotional manipulation.

---

Reception & Legacy: A Cult Classic in the Making

Critical Reception: Praise for Depth, Criticism for Accessibility

ZuluWar! received positive but niche reviews, with critics praising its historical depth and strategic complexity while noting its steep learning curve.

PC Gameworld (83/100) – “A Refreshingly Different Treat”

“There hasn’t been another PC game devoted to the Zulu campaign since Impressions published a Rorke’s Drift game back in the mid-1980s, so once again, Incredible Simulations has found a niche that needed filling. The interface is clean, and the graphics are as good as they need to be. Excellent manual, too. Wargamers looking for something refreshingly different will find ZuluWar! a real treat.”

Computer Gaming World (80/100) – “Well-Balanced and Enjoyable”

“In the end, ZULUWAR! is a good example of where wargames are headed these days: well-balanced, tense, and enjoyable, it’s more than passingly historical game that achieves its goals without becoming mired in complexity for its own sake. And for obscure subjects like these, you’re going to get a lot more gamers hooked on wargames with ZULUWAR! than you are with a dozen TACOPS, for all the latter’s claims of superior ‘realism.'”

The game was also awarded Computer Gaming World’s “Good Things Come in Small Packages” award in 1996, highlighting its balance of simplicity and depth.

Commercial Performance: A Niche Success

As a shareware title, ZuluWar! did not achieve mainstream success, but it found a dedicated audience among:
– Grognards who appreciated its historical accuracy.
– Strategy purists who wanted asymmetrical warfare.
– PBEM enthusiasts who enjoyed long-term strategic duels.

Its lack of widespread recognition was due to:
– No major publisher backing (Incredible Simulations was a small studio).
– No flashy marketing (it relied on word-of-mouth).
– The decline of turn-based wargames in favor of RTS titles.

Legacy: Influencing Later Wargames

While ZuluWar! did not spawn direct sequels, its design philosophies influenced later games:
– Asymmetrical warfare became a staple in titles like Combat Mission and Ultimate General.
– Logistics and supply mechanics were refined in games like Hearts of Iron and Scourge of War.
– PBEM multiplayer remained a cornerstone of digital wargaming, with modern titles like Strategic Command and Panzer Corps continuing the tradition.

Where Is It Now? A Forgotten Gem

Today, ZuluWar! is largely forgotten, but it remains:
– A cult favorite among historical wargame enthusiasts.
– A testament to the power of asymmetrical design.
– A time capsule of 1990s wargaming—before the genre was overshadowed by real-time spectacle.

It is available for free on sites like the Internet Archive, and while its graphics and UI are dated, its strategic depth holds up remarkably well.

---

Conclusion: A Masterpiece of Asymmetrical Wargaming

ZuluWar! is not a game for everyone. It demands patience, strategic thinking, and a willingness to engage with history. It does not hold your hand, it does not dazzle with cinematic flair, and it does not offer instant gratification.

But for those who appreciate the art of wargaming, ZuluWar! is nothing short of a masterpiece. It captures the essence of the Anglo-Zulu War—the hubris of empire, the cunning of the underdog, and the brutal unpredictability of combat. Its asymmetrical design, deep logistics system, and PBEM multiplayer make it ahead of its time, and its focus on a lesser-known conflict gives it a unique identity in a genre often dominated by World War II and Napoleonic Wars.

Final Verdict: 9/10 – A Must-Play for Wargame Aficionados

Pros:
✅ Deep, asymmetrical gameplay that forces players to adapt.
✅ Historically rich with accurate representations of tactics and logistics.
✅ PBEM multiplayer adds long-term strategic depth.
✅ High replayability thanks to customizable scenarios.
✅ A rare focus on the Anglo-Zulu War, a conflict deserving of more attention.

Cons:
❌ Steep learning curve with little hand-holding.
❌ Dated UI and graphics that may deter modern players.
❌ No modern QoL features (e.g., undo, tooltips).
❌ AI is competent but not brilliant.

Where Does It Stand in Gaming History?

ZuluWar! is not a mainstream classic, but it is a vital piece of wargaming history—a game that proved asymmetrical warfare could be both fun and historically accurate. It paved the way for later titles that embraced logistics, fog of war, and PBEM multiplayer, and it remains one of the best simulations of colonial-era conflict ever made.

For strategy purists, it is essential playing. For casual gamers, it may be too niche. But for anyone interested in the intersection of history and gameplay, ZuluWar! is a hidden gem worth excavating.

Final Thought:
If you’ve ever wanted to command the Thin Red Line against the Zulu impis, or lead the charge at Isandlwana, there is no better game than ZuluWar!. It is a testament to the power of turn-based strategy, and a reminder that sometimes, the most interesting battles are the ones where the odds are stacked against you.

Play it. Study it. Respect it. And maybe, just maybe, you’ll avoid the fate of Lord Chelmsford.